MacMiniServer

Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2 – Choosing Your Hardware)

Download the Using Apple OS X Lion Server at Home eBook Now

If you’ve been enjoying our Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server series, then make sure you pick up a copy of the accompanying eBook. You’ll find additional chapters and information on using OS X Lion Server to power your digital home that won’t be available here on the site, and with all of our walkthroughs available in one convenient document (ePub or PDF), it’s far easier to install and configure your server without having to click backward and forwards to the website.

Buy Using OS X Lion Server at Home – £14.99

 

Before we dive into the Apple OS X Lion Server software, it’s worth pausing to consider your hardware setup – Mac hardware doesn’t come cheap, so you should carefully consider whether you wish to fully dedicate a new Mac to acting as your home server, or whether you’re happy to load OS X Lion Server on an existing machine. Now that Lion Server is available as an add-on download from the App Store, the latter is most definitely the more cost effective option.

A New Model

If you’re opting for new hardware, then let’s talk about the good news first. You can install OS X Lion Server on any new Mac model with a modern processor - Intel Core 2 Duo, Core i3, Core i5 or Core i7. Whilst Apple package up a version of the Mac Mini Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) as a small footprint server Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware), don’t think you’re limited to that model. OS X Lion Server will run happily on an iMac, Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) MacBook Air, Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) MacBook Pro, Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) Mac Mini, Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) or Mac Pro. Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware)

MacMiniServer 300x195 Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware)Obviously it’s worth an immediate comparison with Lion Server’s competitors here with regard to processor requirements and the associated power consumption of your hardware. Windows Home Server 2011 will run happily on lower grade, cheaper processors with reduced power consumption, such at the Intel Atom. The higher quality NAS boxes out there are also shipping with Atoms, and that’s likely to translate into cheaper running costs for a machine that is likely to be powered on 24/7. We’re hearing of many readers building WHS 2011 hardware around Intel Core i3 and i5 processors – especially where media transcoding is a requirement – and the power consumption delta is reduced here.

The other comparison you’ll wish to make on hardware is, of course, price. Apple hardware may look great, but with the cheapest Mac shipping today at $599 (the single drive 2.3 GHz Mac mini) you’ll certainly find cheaper PC hardware out there. This won’t be the lowest cost home server hardware you’ll find.

With regard to other specifications OS X Lion Server is restricted to machines with 2GB RAM, but again, all of the new Mac models available today ship with at least that amount of memory, so you’ll be fine picking any model off the shelf.

Using an Existing Mac

Of course, if you already have a number of Macs around the home that meet OS X Lion Server’s hardware requirements, then one of the major changes in this new version of the product will come in very handy indeed. Rather than position Lion Server as a separate, dedicated server platform, it’s now available as an app that can be downloaded and installed on any compatible Mac. That means you can nominate one of the Macs on your network to act as the server. That’s right, the paradigm is rather different. Rather than the traditional concept of servers and clients being different machines, think of OS X Lion Server working as an administrative layer on top of one of your existing clients. All of that client goodness remains on the machine, and you can use it as you would any other Mac on the network – it just happens to be able to manage certain features on your other Macs as a bonus.

It’s this option that we’ll be investigating in our OS X Lion Server series.

Re-purposing an Old Mac

In the same way that thousands of you have re-purposed an old PC for use as a home server, you may be thinking of dusting off that old Apple Mac that’s sitting in the garage for use as your OS X Lion Server. Unfortunately, that’s not going to be an option, unless you’ve previously scrapped a relatively modern Mac. The base operating system, OS X Lion needs a relatively beefy processor as discussed earlier. Without at least an Intel Core 2 Duo on board, you won’t be able to install Lion, and without Lion, there’s no Lion Server.

Of course, the Internet wouldn’t be the Internet if someone hadn’t tried (and apparently succeeded) in hacking around to get Lion working on Intel Core Duo and  Solos. For the truly committed, there’s an option available but expect some bumps along the way.

Hackintosh

hackintosh 150x150 Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware)Whilst Cupertino does its very best to lock OS X to Apple hardware, it is possible (for the hardcore tinkerer) to run the operating system on standard PC hardware. Welcome to the world of the Hackintosh. Running this kind of installation is out of scope for us in this series, but there are plenty of guides and walkthroughs available online, with Lion installation guides emerging now. Google is your friend. Expect a healthy dose of frustration, and a few glitches along the way post-install. But it’s certainly a cheaper option than buying new hardware.

A Question of Storage

So, you’ve figured out what you’ll be using as the base hardware for OS X Lion Server. But there’s one other hardware factor to work out. The average Mac boasts sleek lines and strong aesthetics, but beauty comes at the expense of utility. How many hard drives are fitted to your Mac? Hang on, I’ll have a guess – one, right? It’s probably not that large, either, is it? Even if you’ve plumped for Apple’s Mac Mini Server, you see that the base spec offers only two 500GB drives – hardly storage central.

If you only have a small amount of data stored on the network, you may well be able to fit your Mac Backups and media library on your nominated server’s hard drive. But more likely, you’re going to need to figure out a storage expansion option. Again, there are a few options available to you, depending on whether you wish to have one centralised pool of storage attached to the server, or whether you prefer to split your storage across the network.

Across the network? We’re talking here about Apple’s Time Capsule Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware). You need network storage for two things. Your media libraries (thinktime capsule Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) music, videos, photos and docs) and your computer backups. You could prioritise physical storage on the server for your media, and allow Time Capsule to look after the backups. Time Capsule is network device which combines a 2TB or 3TB hard drive with a dual-band 802.11n router. Switch out your existing router with the Time Capsule, and it’ll appear automatically on your clients (and indeed the server too) as a target backup disk for Time Machine.

The alternative option is to expand the storage on the server itself. Whilst you could upgrade the server’s existing internal hard drive, you may well be better off attaching an external hard drive or disk enclosure. The disk enclosure route offers the most flexible option for future expansion as well as data protection, with the ability to add more disks, or swap out existing disks for higher capacity models over time. Many enclosures offer built in RAID protection too, mirroring the data stored on one drive to other drives in the array.

PROMISE Pegasus Thunderbolt Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware)The fastest connection to a direct attached storage array is likely to come via Apple’s all-new Thunderbolt connector, which offers two simultaneous bi-directional file transfer speeds of 10 Gb/s (compare that to USB 3.0′s 5 Gb/s speed in one direction). The only issue here is that Thunderbolt compatible storage devices are thin on the ground, and expensive. Right now, you’re limited to the Promise Pegasus Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware)range of devices (in 4 and 6 bay options) alongside products announced by Sonnet and LaCie.

In terms of more traditional options, you’ll be looking for connecting your storage device via Firewire 800 (theoretical throughput 800 Mbps) or the slower USB 2.0 connect0r (480 Mbps). Most modern devices that support Macs will offer both connectors, and we’d recommend the Firewire 800 option. It’s worth taking a look at the LaCie Quadra Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) storage range, alongside the Drobo S Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) 5-bay storage array – we’ll be using the latter in this series for its flexible BeyondRAID storage management feature, and strong expansion potential.

Our Selection

So, to recap, what hardware will we be using for our OS X Lion Server project?

Base Computer: Apple iMac 21.5″ Desktop Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware) with Intel Core i7 processor, 1TB Hard Disk and 8GB RAM
Additional Storage: Drobo S Using Apple OS X Lion Server as a Home Server (Part 2   Choosing Your Hardware)

Don’t worry if you’re wondering about the 8GB RAM fitted to the iMac. That was just specced up at the time of the build for future expansion. You’ll be absolutely fine with 2 or 4GB on board, as well as a slower processor.

With the hardware sorted out, join us in Part 3 of our series, we’ll take a look at the features to be discovered in OS X Lion Server and assess their relevance for the home.

 


Enjoyed this post? Share it.

If you enjoyed reading this post, then why not share it with your friends and followers?

About Terry Walsh

Terry Walsh is the founding editor and owner of We Got Served. Since February 2007, the site has provided detailed coverage and analysis of the emerging home server category, and has subsequently grown into a trusted outlet for digital home news and reviews.

Sign Up for WGS Daily News

If you don't want to miss out on the latest news from We Got Served, why not subscribe to our daily digest? You'll get the day's headlines and a short summary of each news item delivered straight to your inbox each morning.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Mario C.

    May I ask why you did not mention (consider) FireWire 800 external RAID devices? Traditionally, FireWire tends to be the preferred external mass storage device connection for Macs. Did you already have the USB 2.0 Drobo?

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hey Mario,

      Thanks for the comment – yes, that's an oversight, apologies! I'll drop in an edit to the post. The systems we mentioned can be connected via USB 2.0 or Firewire 800, but Firewire is the faster connection. Yes, I do have the Drobo here already, but its BeyondRAID system does make drive expansion easier than traditional RAID boxes.

  • Arnold

    If you're going to use a drobo anyway, why bother with a separate server ?

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Well, using additional storage such as a Drobo is just one option – whilst it covers our storage requirements and can act as a backup target for Time Machine without using OS X Lion Server, as we'll see in the next part of the series, Lion Server brings a host of features into play which lets us manage a range of features on the Macs on the network – remote access, user accounts, shared calendars, mobile device management and more…..

  • fralcopop

    I must say it hit me as like a breath of fresh air to me the moment I saw the Mac headline on WGS, a site that I associate with Windows, and Home Server. And after what happened and the lack of any positive news our of the field for a while, I have no doubt this Mac Server series is going to be very interesting.
    Funny that Terry mentioned the hackintosh scene as well. Wow, I mean, that was really unexpected. Definitely not what or how I think of WGS. All the Best mate.

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hi fralcopop

      Thanks for the note – always good to have a little bit of freshness in life! With the changes released in Lion Server, the time's right for us to take a look…

      I've been pleasantly surprised by the positive comments the first two posts have received so far. Looks like a lot of us are facing similar challenges at home with our tech.

  • Marcel

    Thanks for part 2 very interesting.

    As i said i switched to Linux 2 years ago (Server OS). Maybe i have to replace my server after the articles are published.

    I bought a iPhone and used a Hackintosh for awhile. I'm very positive about Apple hardware and software and i was a Microsoft fan boy… well not anymore. I'm considering to buy a Mac Mini or a iMac to replace my destop hardware.

    Never thought seeing articles about Apple hard and software. Thanks Terry!

  • Chuck

    Terry – Just an idea here: if there's enough interest following up on this topic, perhaps you could create a section in the forums for Lion Server Home Server usage so we could continue the discussion?

  • james

    Hello to Terry and all the fine readers here.

    I’m an IT network at a school in Taipei and we have 10 OSX Servers currently serving our institution. Setting up a server based on OSX isn’t a light task that most “home” network admins maybe willing to take on. Making sure that an OSX Server is running correctly ISN’T a set once and forget and leave alone type of operation. Far from it.

    Although Apple is announcing that the Lion OSX Server is the server for the rest of us, this is not the case at this current time and date. Sorry to break this news to everyone. I’m just being honest. The truth is that, the Lion OSX Server is a bit buggy at this point. Most server software at this point do come on the scene with bugs under the hood. This is a fact we early adopters must face. We have upgraded two of our Snow Leopard servers to Lion and it’s been hard taming this animal. It’s still a bit wild.

    As we use our OSX Servers for everything from mail to audio and video podcasting, we get to know fairly quickly what this animal can and can’t do. Some of this issues we have encountered so far include memory usage increasing to up to 6.4 GB, CPU usage running over 96% for no reason, status charts not displaying, iOS devices unable to view audio and video podcasts, Non-Safari browsers unable to view or playback audio and video podcast (this includes Firefox (5.0.1), IE (8) and Chrome). One big problem is that, because of GPL agreement issues, Apple has drop support for connecting to SMB network shares. And the list continues. Above all, two tools are now needed to fully control and monitor the Lion server (Server App and Server Admin).

    All that I am saying is, if someone is only interested in light file and media sharing a full Lion OSX Server may not be the best route to go. A simple resource share to a networked computer maybe all that is needed. The Lion OSX Server is still very much wild and I hope it will be tamed soon.

    James
    WDEVN, Taiwan

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hi James

      Great perspective – thanks for sharing your experience. As we bump into these issues then we'll be sure to share our thoughts too on these bugs. It certainly seems that Lion Server is a transition product…

      Would love to hear anyone else's experiences with Lion Server so far.

      Terry

      • James

        Hi again Terry,

        If you do setup the Lion server please try to playback any podcast or video cast you create in different browsers and both iOS devices and non-iOS devices. You will begin to see that someone didn't do their homework.

        I'll be tuning in!

        James

  • Carl V

    I will be fascinated by the outcome here. Apple scraped their server hardware sometime ago. 10.7 Server to me, just looks like the leftovers of that failure. Yes the software is cheap, but it's cheap for a reason.
    You must be quite board and sitting on a mountain of cash at WGS. Please publish the actual cost of the resulting server when all is said and done. The Drobo S is over $700 alone without any drives!

  • John

    Hi Terry,

    We just recently renovated our house and wired Cat 6 throughout.  The main reason we hardwired everything was to be able to fully realize sufficient download speeds for HD movie rentals via Apple TV, Netflix, etc.  As well we wish to share our family photo library and music with all devices, particularly our HDTV’s via Apple TV’s.

    My question for you is whether we should purchase a Mac Mini (Top of the line) upgraded with i7 Duo Processor and 8GB RAM or a Mac Mini Lion Server with 8GB RAM.  I already know that there are many features of Lion Server that I probably wouldn’t utilize, but I’m wondering whether the Quad Core i7 would be able to better serve iPhoto and iTunes content better than the Mac Mini (considering that the Mac Mini has a dedicated GPU).

    I would also like to have this computer hooked up to one of our HDTV’s via HDMI so that we can use it as a stand alone client (web surfing, iPhoto manipulation, word processing, etc. – not to worried about game play).

    I contacted Apple, and spoke with four different people – their recommendation was split.

    Please advise,

    John

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hey John,

      If you're just looking for a device to sit connected to a TV for media streaming and sharing, then the Mac Mini will do the trick, without the need for Lion Server. Your other devices on the network should be able to see the Mac Mini and share files no problem and if you want the additional client management features of Lion Server at some point in the future, then you can install the app at a later date. It'll work fine on that Mac Mini spec, and in the meantime, the i7 should easily manage the tasks you wish to throw at it.

      The Mac Mini Server ships with a Quad Core processor and extra hard drive, neither of which you really need with the requirements you've outlined.

      Hope that helps!
      Terry

  • MacShack

    I have just bought a LaCie 5Big Backup Server. This is my first server in the house and we are an all mac household (also a bootcamp for my developer work). I really was considering Lion Server. The price was just too hefty. I now have a server for about € 264,- and 4 x 1tb drives. Total cost of € 444,- . It supports Time Machine because of the ExtremeZ-IP technology that LaCie ships with the server. It just got updated to support the new Lion AFP authentication. LaCie has great support as my tickets are answered the same day of posting, with great help and suggestions. It all works flawlessly for what I want to do with it. Backups and file sharing. The only gripe I have is that it doesn't do RAID 5 and uses the software RAID 1 called folder duplication. But the LaCie storage server was already way beyond my budget. I have thought about baptizing my desktop iMac into a server but I also use it for bootcamp and therefore wouldn't be a good candidate. The other computer is a old MacBook laptop. Which works great but is always everywhere and sometimes, nowhere. I'm wondering why you went for a Drobo S system. Drobo is very expensive and their technology seems to be a bit shaky with their "Beyond RAID" technology. You could have just bought an OWC Mercury Elite Pro Qx2 for $300,- which performs much better than a Drobo. Of course you do have to think about all the laws of RAID. But that shouldn't be a problem for a person like you, right?

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hi MacShack

      The focus of the series is on Lion Server rather than assessing the various storage options out there, which is why I outlined a couple of options in terms of more standard storage devices such as LaCie's Quadra range (and there are a host of others which are similar) and devices such as Drobo which offer proprietary "hybrid" RAID features.

      As you indicate, some devices require more knowledge of RAID than others – devices like Drobo provide easier configuration and storage management features such as creation of storage pools for different sized disks, easy drive upgrade features and so on – but Drobo has been criticised for slower transfer speeds.

      In truth, we have a Drobo S currently available as a review unit, so it's a convenient option for the feature – I'll outline how well (or not) it performs at the appropriate point in time – but as mentioned, a full analysis of the varying storage options and performance levels of disk enclosures out there is for another post!

      Very surprised abou the price you got on the LaCie 5big Backup Server – sounds like you picked up a bargain!

      Terry

      • MacShack

        Fair points Terry. As I will be skipping this OS X server option for the moment, I am looking forward to your findings. Keep up the good work! You have my attention.

  • Anonymous

    Do you have hard numbers showing that the Mac Mini with its i5 consumes more than any Atom PC out there? From reading and searching information about building the most power efficient x86-based server I could, I have never found anyone claiming better power consumption numbers at idle than a Mac Mini.

    I would gladly see alternative options to a Mac Mini, as power consumption (which goes hand in hand with heat and noise generation) is one of the only criteria I have for an x86-based server.

  • Charles

    Terry,

    I currently have a iMAC 21in and have been loving it ever since I made the switch last year. Over the past few months, I did my first build and it was a WHS 2011. I currently have 6TB installed and am very interested in your pursuit of figuring out the kinks with OS X Lion Server. My question is, what is the best type of software to utilize the full capability of Lion Server? I mean, I can remotely log in, share files via the website and all that other fun stuff, but that would defeat the purpose of having Lion Server if it isn't going to be directly mirrored to the storage within the server. I have been reading up about unRAID software and it seems a bit intriguing, but I still want to get more specifics before making the jump as, 6TB is a lot of stuff to be messing around with. If you know of any software that would be compatible for a home build, please let me know and I look forward to the rest of your articles regarding this Lion Server process.

  • Geeba

    Hmmm I'm just not seeing this.. I purposely held on to this email to read this article. I thought the Hack would have the staring role here – not "Running this kind of installation is out of scope for us"?

    Why would I spend £1,200 on over priced hardware that is basically a socking great big screen with no harddrive bays in it then have to buy a £600 Drobo minus disks to sit along side it?

    Thats a bit like saying – lets buy an expensive sports car and make it into a van to store all my stuff in!

    My current WHS box is a home built box, 1 mains lead, 1 ethermet cable, little blue light on the front… sat in my attic… done.

    • Terry Walsh

      That’s all fine. I think you’re possibly pre-judging any recommendations I may or may not be making here about OS X Server’s suitability in the home. Let’s hold fire until we get to the end of the series and we’ll have a clear view.

      With regard to the hardware choice, you may have missed the variety of options presented here. Just because I’ve gone with a spec for this feature doesn’t mean that’s the hardware I’d recommend for everyone.

      As for your v1 box – glad it’s serving you well. Would love to know how you’re backing up any Mac clients to it.

      • Geeba

        I only have one Hack – I'm one of the weird people that still prefers Windows 7 – I used to work for Mirror Group Newspapers which at the time had the highest concentration of Apples in the UK – to be honest they were just as much a pain as the windows based machines.

        So really have no need to back it up… does OSX Server back up Windows based machines? If not I guess your jumping from one incomplete solution to another… just with bigger bills.

        I'd be very supprised if people in here havent also purchased Apple underpants too!

        Also give XBMC a go… its the original media centre that Elan forked to develop Plex.

  • Dam6

    I have now removed 'We got Served' from my Opera speed dial list. I hope Apple paid well as the last 4 hardware articles on the front page are all APPLE related.

    • Terry Walsh

      Yep, that’s because it’s a *series*. No payment required, Dam6 – this is all about discovery and exploration. Try it out some time. :-)

  • wombat94

    Following this eagerly.

    I'm currently in the process of exploring Lion Server as well. I'm a long time (since the first beta) WHS v1 user. Recently upgraded to WHS2011 – it's nice enough, but similar to you, I've had Macintoshes invading my home lan for the last 2 years (it all started with one iPhone, then another, then a Mac Book Pro so I could write iOS software, followed by an iPad 1, two iPhone 4s, another iPad 1 and now two Hackintoshes – one for the kids PC – love OSX parental controls for time management – the second as a main desktop machine – Hackintosh Mac Pro.

    The Hack Pro has been updated to Lion and I'm looking at Lion Server to replace the WHS2011.

    Without drive pooling, the thing I liked most about WHS v1 is gone anyway.

    At this point, the only Windows machines in the home lan are the WHS box itself, my MAME machine, and my Wife's laptop. I'll see if I can get the laptop replaced in the next year or so if I can pry it from her hands. The MAME machine can stay WIndows – no need to go to that expense, but it also doesn't really need anything from the server. It's on the LAN but that's just so I can remote control it to update games/config of the front-end a couple of times a year.

    I am also moving to Apple TV2s as the preferred streaming boxes on our 3 TVs, so the Mac Pro will be running all the time to serve up iTunes HomeSharing to the rest of the LAN… might as well see about consolidating the file services onto one box on 24×7

    Ted

  • LA

    Terry, 

    This series is an excellent resource. Just one thought which may be helpful to some readers. For some applications it may be beneficial to have two network interfaces at the same time and it would appear that Macs having only one network interface is not up to the task. Apple makes an ethernet adapter that seamlessly connects over USB port.  In the US it retails for $29, so it is relatively inexpensive. It is simple to set up… just plug it in.

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Nice tip, LA – thanks!

  • Shahrul

    Hi Terry,

    Thanks for the postings.

    I am considering my first server for my office which consists of windows of various segment – xp home, ME, vista home basic, 7 Pro. The intention is just for file sharing and the server to the proposed accounting software.

    I have read the pro and cons of the Mac mini server and have already thinking of forgetting it until the idea of installing Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essential into Mac mini server on Parallel came.

    Why?
    - Mac mini server is cheap. Windows ther hardware server only comes with 320GB hard disk and 2GB Ram and yet more expensive
    - I will have 2 server in 1 nice cute enclosure
    - silent, low power consumption
    - iOS friendly server in hand

    Is this a good solution?

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hi 

      Two thoughts occur – firstly, think through your future storage requirements, and ensure you’re confident with just the two hard drives. If it’s simply accounting data you’re storing, then that may be fine. If you need to combine Windows SBSE and Lion Server on the one box, then a virtualised solution is very neat. SBSE should work fine on the Mac Mini.

      Let us know how you get on!

  • Anonymous

    Hi Terry,

    I have bought a mid 2010 Mac Mini from eBay and now looking at buying an external storage device, I like the idea of Drobo and its ability to cope with different size disks. My question is, Drobo S or FS? My house has a Gigabit LAN throughout it, so does that mean the FS would be best suited? I want to be able to access it from an iMac that runs Adobe Lightroom 3, Mac Mini (obviously), MacBook Pro, Apple TV2, iPhones 4/S, iPad2 and maybe the PS3. I will be storing my wife’s photo collection and TimeMachine backups on it.

    Nice work on the ebook btw, I bought it the other week… Once the series is complete, i think the printer at work will be used. ;)

    Thanks

    Tim

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hi Tim,

      I think the FS is the way to go if you’re cabled up through the house… glad you’re enjoying the book!

      Best
      Terry

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Hi Tim,

      I think the FS is the way to go if you’re cabled up through the house… glad you’re enjoying the book!

      Best
      Terry