no-3d-glasses

Toshiba to Kill the 3D Glasses?

I saw a very interesting article earlier today regarding a rumor about Toshiba, 3D TV, and 3D glasses.  According to electronista, Toshiba will ship 3D TVs late this year that will *not* require those 1950s era 3D glasses.

no3dglasses thumb Toshiba to Kill the 3D Glasses?

Toshiba is not commenting, but it would be a very cool thing if true.

Just the idea of not having to wear 60-year-old glasses over my regular glasses is wonderful.  Just the idea of watching 3D without getting a headache is wonderful.

The downside is that if you have to ask how much it will cost, you won’t be able to afford it.  Not yet anyway…

The mini-article from electronista:

Toshiba to bring out glasses-free 3D TVs in 2010

Toshiba may release the first 3D TV that does not require viewers to wear special glasses to get the full 3D effect, according to a report from Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun on Tuesday. The set is rumored to be available in three different sizes and be out in time for the holidays. Prices have not been set, but will skew to the high end at several thousand dollars each.

The technology used for this will emit multiple rays of light from various angles so that viewers sitting at various positions around the TV can see stereoscopic images without glasses. At the same time, this will mean less eye strain for the viewers, anonymous sources for the newspaper said.

Glasses-free 3D has been possible for a significant amount of time but has rarely found its way into the market as it has usually needed very narrow “sweet spots” where the image aligns properly. Newer designs widen the sweet spots and create more of them to allow multiple viewers.

Toshiba has not commented on these rumors and is not ready to make an official statement regarding such glasses-free 3D TVs.


Enjoyed this post? Share it.

If you enjoyed reading this post, then why not share it with your friends and followers?

About Jim Clark

Hello. I’m from the heartland of the U.S. Lots of corn and beans, although Iowa is a lot more than just farmland. It also has a few computer enthusiasts (no, not me!). I’ve been around PCs since I got my 1st PC XT aloooong time ago. WGS is one of the first sites I found centered around WHS. And the best. Every once in awhile, I do get away from the KB and enjoy time with and my wife and our 4 kids. And I do have a day job.

Sign Up for WGS Daily News

If you don't want to miss out on the latest news from We Got Served, why not subscribe to our daily digest? You'll get the day's headlines and a short summary of each news item delivered straight to your inbox each morning.

, , ,

  • jeffreytz

    Ha, well none of the current 3D TVs require you to where the 60's glasses, they're shutter glasses.

  • Anon

    Agreed. Those were passive glasses, usually with a red and blue filter. The latest 3DTVs employ active shuttlers to show alternating frames to each eye.

  • Jim_Clark

    hmmm. Sounds like a lot of justification going on here. ;) Even my kids agree going to a 3D movie is a headache producing experience.

    • urmaster

      Your kids don't get shutter glasses at the movie do they?

      • Jim_Clark

        I do not believe that is an option at movie theaters. I suppose I should limit this to watching TV…

  • urmaster

    lol the shutter glasses do reduce the symptoms of wearing glasses and they aren't exactly 60 years old but they are still lackluster: Priced too high to even begin to be a viable option to those with children in a house.
    Sometime incompatible with other TVs so bring them round a mates can be a challenge.

    Auto Stereoscopy FTW

    • Jim_Clark

      Sounds like lots of disadvantages for IMHO a not-ready-for-primetime technology. The whole 3D technology, that is.

      • urmaster

        I don't think you should write it off completely, for movies and television it might be well pretty awful ATM. But I think there will still be a market for it in gaming where it does actually have a benefit.

        • Jim_Clark

          You are most definitely correct on the gaming side of things. But that is a significant chuck of change to put out for "pretty awful ATM" for use as a regular TV.

          My take on this whole thing is that one company said "3D TV" which meant everyone out there had to have one in their product line. Regardless of how good/bad the experience is. :)

  • http://organizefish.com/blog/archives/4 Matilda Delahunt

    I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.