header_540_generic

Welcome to Windows Server Code Name Vail Preview Refresh

After 18 months of development, the preview of Windows Home Server “Vail” is finally here! Or, to use its official name, “Windows Server Code Name “Vail””. There has been a huge amount of conjecture pinging around the web for well over a year ever since Microsoft hinted that the next version of Windows Home Server was in development – a leaked build in January, duly pulled apart by the usual online commentators, provided a number of hints to the future direction of the platform. Microsoft have now officially lifted the curtain to allow the public the chance to kick the tyres on their development work to date.

We Got Served has a massive preview of what you can expect to find in Windows Server Code Name “Vail” Preview. Before we dig into the detail, as seasoned beta testers, we’d advise you to remember that this is an early build of the product, and as such, there’s always a risk that features you see in today’s build may not make it into the final product, and features that Microsoft may not be ready for us to see may appear at a later date.

Downloading the Beta

We’ve got a lot for you to read and see, so it’s a great idea to head over to Microsoft Connect now, sign up for the beta and download the latest build. It’s over 4GB, so unless you’re on the kind of internet connection I’d really like, it’s going to take a while to come down the line. What better way to spend your time waiting than by checking out the WGS Vail Preview?

To sign-up and download the beta:

  1. Visit Microsoft’s Windows Home Server beta site at: http://connect.microsoft.com/windowshomeserver
  2. If you haven’t registered, you’ll need to do so with a Hotmail or other Windows Live email address
  3. Apply to join the beta
  4. When you get access, hit the Downloads section, where you’ll find the following:

- Windows Home Server Code Name “Vail” Preview Refresh Installation DVD (4.2 GB)
- Windows Home Server Code Name “Vail” Preview Refresh Server Recovery CD (196 MB)
- Windows Home Server Code Name “Vail” Preview Refresh Client Restore CD (467 MB)
- Windows Home Server Code Name “Vail” Preview Refresh QFE (KB2314472) (360KB)

Unlike the first iteration of the beta (released in April 2010), the current Vail Preview Refresh’s Release Notes are now available online, although at the time of writing, the website Microsoft point to is down. The link is http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/vail/release-notes-2.aspx. However, a temporary home for the release notes is available here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/release-notes-2.aspx

Once you’ve downloaded the beta files, they’ll be available in the folder you downloaded them to.

1 thumb8 Welcome to Windows Server Code Name Vail Preview Refresh

At this stage, note that only the English language build is available. German and Japanese versions of the Vail Preview Refresh will not be made available to the public.

Beta Basics – Hardware

One of the first things to check is that your test hardware (you’re going to run the beta on test hardware, right? You wouldn’t think of trusting a beta OS with your data, would you?) is sufficiently capable to run Vail.

Microsoft have not announced the final hardware requirements for Vail, but the current view (minimum requirements) is:

Processor
: 1.4GHz 64-bit Compatible processor
RAM: 2GB
Hard Drive: At least one 160GB Hard Drive (60GB System Volume, 100GB Storage)

Note
: The RAM requirement has been increased from the first Vail Preview release from 1GB to 2GB

As we’ll see in our Remote Access preview, you should consider the above a minimum specification. One of the major new features of Windows Home Server “Vail” is the ability to transcode and stream video on the fly to a remote PC over the web. Real-time transcoding takes a lot of processing power and as such, if this feature is interesting to you, we’d recommend a home server with a far faster processor and RAM. For the record, I’ll be running the beta on an Intel Core i5-based system with 4GB RAM. In a recent interview with Intel, we discussed what type of processor would be required for real-time video transcoding on Vail. Whilst not an official view, the Core i3 or Pentium processor was suggested as a suitable minimum. Intel Atom processors are likely to struggle with on the fly video transcoding.

With regard to testing on OEM hardware (e.g. a HP or Acer home server) – in theory this is possible via an unattended install using a USB hard drive, but is not for the feint-hearted. Remember, Windows Home Server OEM machines are headless, and therefore you’re unable to attach a monitor to them. Using a vanilla WHS Vail build on one of these machines would be considered experimental, and is likely to cause pain. Lots of it.

For more on hardware requirements, check out our Vail Hardware Requirements Deep Dive.

Beta Basics – Bug Reporting

Remember, Microsoft release these previews because they want you to find bugs! Those of us who were around for the Windows Home Server v1 beta all managed to miss the infamous data corruption bug (as did Microsoft, so there you go) but having thousands of users hammering the build really is the best way of ensuring that the final release is as strong as possible.

That means if you spot a problem, or anything that doesn’t work as you’d expect it to, you should file a bug using the feedback form on Microsoft Connect. The WHS team have also released a special log collector tool for beta testers, which captures all required logs from the Vail server and connected computers at the time of the problem. You’ll need to ensure that you collect and submit logs with each bug you submit – they’re really important in helping the team identify the root cause of the problem.

If you’ve skipped downloading the log collector, head back to Connect and download it!

Beta Duration and Structure

At this point, we do not know how long the beta is expected to last or how many releases there will be before an RTM build is announced. My guess would be that we may be looking at an extended period lasting quite a few months, with multiple builds released, but that’s conjecture. For now, work on the basis that we’ll see a beta, plus one or two release candidates before we get to the final release.

Vail Preview’s release history is as follows:

April 26th 2010 – Vail Preview released
August 16th 2010 – Vail Preview Refresh released


Enjoyed this post? Share it.

If you enjoyed reading this post, then why not share it with your friends and followers?

About Terry Walsh

Terry Walsh is the founding editor and owner of We Got Served. Since February 2007, the site has provided detailed coverage and analysis of the emerging home server category, and has subsequently grown into a trusted outlet for digital home news and reviews.

Sign Up for WGS Daily News

If you don't want to miss out on the latest news from We Got Served, why not subscribe to our daily digest? You'll get the day's headlines and a short summary of each news item delivered straight to your inbox each morning.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://grahammurray.wordpress.com Graham

    Does it include built-in support for two factor authentication? My add-in to support this in V1 is a bit of a hack due to lack of extensibility options. It would be great if something were built-in or the login portion where easily extensible.

    Problem is, if we rely on add-ins to make the remote access site actually secure, then when we get things like mobile apps that connect to WHS (I'm looking at YOU windows phone 7) they will likely not support any kind of security flexibility. I don't know about anyone else, but it gives me the heebie jeebies to be a keylogger away from someone gaining unauthorized access to my entire network, which is why I created TwoFactor WHS in the first place. I just wish MS would take this a bit more seriously if they want us to make our home networks accessible from the web.

  • http://tom.morr.is Tom

    Will Vail support the new Windows Live Sync? (previously Live Mesh)

    Would be a shame if it didn't, as I think it would be quite useful.

    • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

      Live Sync does support Vail, I believe.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Drashna Drashna

    Graham, check out the SDK on connect. From what I've heard, the SDK is muuuch more robust, and useful, and there is a huge section about the website too! A lot more customizable.

  • Pingback: Fashion Jewelry » Blog Archive » QVC UK-Silk Route Fashion Jewelry 090617-B5

  • Pingback: Philadelphia Night Life - Hotels, Bars, Restaurants, Entertainment and More » Blog Archive » Philadelphia Hotels and Nightlife | Those Amsterdam Hotels That Will Stop Millions of Hearts

  • Pingback: » Blog Archive » Runescape guide to easy Gold

  • Pingback: | Natural Remedies for Health

  • ian_kds

    Well once again Microsoft you have done it again. Gone and ignored hundreds of your followers requests for the inclusion of a media centre into the new server. In your inimitable way you have again stamped on the dreams and hopes of those of us who know what we want, and gone your own sweet way.
    I don’t know why you think we will all carry on following like lambs to the slaughter and go out to buy a new piece of software that offers nothing more than a fancy UI. If we had wanted just a file Server we would have gone that route ourselves and installed 2008 R2. What we wanted is for Microsoft to show a bit of initiative and come up with a new, inventive product that fills a gaping hole in the SOHO market and would have been a stunning product. Instead with all your brilliant programming power, and some of the best software engineers in the world, brought us a pathetic offering, no better than WHS Ver1. Somebody should be sacked at Redmond for missing a golden opportunity to make the company unique in this market. Obviously there is no intention to add much more to the BETA version of ‘Vail’ as the SDK has also been released for developers to start making the add-ins. This is a sad reflection of a company who has got so big it has lost its way. Beware Microsoft !! just look what happened to all the giant banking corps that went on their merry way with scarce regard for their customers. You too can fall just as they have done if you continue to tread on your PAYING customers. I for one will not be splashing out hard earned cash on new shinny hardware and this sad piece of software, which is just a glorified backup service. Thanks Microsoft for NOTHING !!

    • Soundtweaker

      Why have WMC in WHS when you would have to have double the files for everything?
      You would need all your backups and duplicate raw movies and music for WMC to access?

      • http://www.wegotserved.com Terry Walsh

        Many people asking for WMC support are wishing for TV Tuner support, so they don't need to run WHS and WMC on two separate boxes.

  • -Fritz

    When I built my WHS R1 server 7 months ago, I had R2 on my mind and purchased appropriate hardware.

    I would love to see a tool that exports all data that I currently have… backups and shared folders etc… to a separate device… Could be NAS could be USB.

    Then allow me to upgrade from R1 to R2 on existing hardware and import the old data.

    While the new version sounds great, without this capability, I will wait for a hardware failure to force my hand.

    The level of effort to discard all my backups and move data myself is to much.
    The cost of buying another hardware platform is beyond my desired budget.

    I look forward to reading the posts about this great new product.

  • Cameron

    I think the hardware requirements are dumb I run whs on a computer with a 40gb hardrive and 512mb of ram and a 500gb hardrive for storage now I will have to upgrade! :-(

  • michael

    I fully agree with the previous poster! WMC support should have been included in Vail. so far the only differences I see are that it is 64 bit (who cares?), it has a prettier interface (again, who cares?), and it does remote streaming over silverlight. Microsoft, I can not honestly justify to myself spending the time and money to upgrade for very little benefit. as I have it now, my version 1 has sagetv installed for TvTuner support, has magicjack installed for home phone service, and is still my media back up and file server. It TRUELY is the center of my home! why would I trade something tested and true for something that blatently ignored all our requests and would give me minimal benefit? microsoft, you have failed… I for one will NOT be purchasing your Vail software. Instead I will buy the new version of sage that is right now in beta and upgrade my version 1 WHS. at least sage has been listening to its users…

  • JED

    Is there step-by-step instructions on doing a Vail server restore?

    My client restores (x86>x64 & x64>x86) worked great but I wanted to now test the Server restore too.

  • JED

    OK, I found the answer to my question over @
    http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/whsvailb

  • http://www.doxgame.com psp 3000 akku

    Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enyed reading your blog posts. Any way I¡¯ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon¡­

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiN1LVyHS9I predictions of 2012

    I guess I see it the same way.