id_front_angle

Hands On: HP X310 Data Vault

That said, small business users simply do not need many of the features that shipped with the first Data Vault, so it makes sense for them to be removed in the entry-level series, to create a server that is more focused and more relevant to the customer based at which its targeted.

The good news is that the removal of these features from the software balances nicely against the performance hit created by the use of the Atom processor. We tested a 175MB file transfer on both the X510 and X310, with the following results:

X310 vs X510 File Transfer Comparison

Read (Wireless)Write (Wireless)Read (Wired)Write (Wired)
X310 Data Vault1:181:260:200:28
X510 Data Vault1:371:250:290:28

From these figures, it can be argued that the stripping back of the Data Vault’s feature set has boosted performance over the more powerful X510, with basic tasks like file transfers completing more quickly on the new model. It’s a similar story with overall Console responsiveness, with the X310’s Windows Home Server Console opening in 20 seconds from launch, whilst the X510 chugs along to open in 1 minute 8 seconds.

My guess here is that the performance boost is in no small part due to the removal of TwonkyMedia Server on the X310, a DLNA media server that enhances media streaming support for a wider variety of digital media receivers, but has been dogged by performance issues since it was introduced on the MediaSmart Server series a couple of years ago. The comparison clearly proves the low power Intel Atom D510 with 2GB RAM in support is a fine choice for the X310, and browsers should be confident in its ability to perform the day to day basic tasks of a small office server.

Conclusions

HP’s introduction of the X310 Data Vault is a smart move. With the benefit of a little extra time, the company has been able to better assess the capabilities of the Data Vault’s first generation and tailor both hardware and software to create an entry level small office server that’s more relevant to its target market, and despite weaker hardware, performs better.

We’re happy to see Twonky MediaServer pulled from the product – it’s performance overhead dogs the HP MediaSmart Server and X510 Data Vault, and hobbles those servers to a degree where the promise of HP’s value added applications is never fully realised. The loss of the associated media features in the X310, for small business customers, is no loss. In the X310 HP have a great solution for micro businesses that combines the great backup, file sharing and remote access features of Windows Home Server, with good looking hardware that’s flexible enough to grow as your business needs grow.

In reality, however, we should consider the X310 a “1.5 release”. If the X510 was HP’s toe in the water of the micro business market, they’ve done the right thing with the X310 to strip back the consumer features and aesthetic of the debut model. But we’re still missing the value added software that will truly differentiate the Data Vault series over an above its competitors. Sure, HP have a great reputation in small business, and are building out their after-sales service and support capabilities to offer businesses an integrated 360 degree solution that will give many business owners true peace of mind.

Looking purely at hardware, however, with Acer’s forthcoming H342 Aspire easyStore Home Server about to hit the market with a very similar specification and chassis at an aggressive price (their current mode, the H340, is available at $349 online – a full $200 less than the X310), HP’s new model feels a little expensive and the really budget conscious may turn to Acer’s solution which offers the same core functionality as the X310. If HP were to drop the price X310’s by $50 or so and build out a suite of strong value-added business add-ins for the Data Vault series, then, with all of that after sales service and support available, they’d have a winning “2.0” solution. We look forward to seeing HP continue to build towards this in the future.

In the meantime, we’d certainly recommend the X310 over its bigger brother for small business. It’s a highly capable server solution that will give micro businesses all of the data protection they need, whilst enhancing business value through easy file sharing and remote access – and at a price that’s significantly better value than the previous model.


Enjoyed this post? Share it.

If you enjoyed reading this post, then why not share it with your friends and followers?

About Terry Walsh

Terry Walsh is the founding editor and owner of We Got Served. Since February 2007, the site has provided detailed coverage and analysis of the emerging home server category, and has subsequently grown into a trusted outlet for digital home news and reviews.

Sign Up for WGS Daily News

If you don't want to miss out on the latest news from We Got Served, why not subscribe to our daily digest? You'll get the day's headlines and a short summary of each news item delivered straight to your inbox each morning.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Nick

    Can I get the 3.1 software for my X510? I have all of the features that have been removed for this release disabled by default (media collector, Twonky, Video conversion etc), so 3.1 would provide me with a much cleaner console that what I have at the moment?

    • Terry Walsh

      At this point, I doubt it will be made available, but check with HP support.

  • Gary Jones

    Can I back up the X310 itself to a drive system attached to the eSATA port? I'd like to use the X310 as my primary NAS but want to have a way to keep an offsite back of the data stored on the X310.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tezzer Terry Walsh

      You can back up the data stored on the X310's shared folders – but not the OS itself.

  • Wolfgang

    I am using now for a couple month the HP X311, and while the product overall runs fine, I find it to be extremely slow, especially when backing up first time a new device (like a new PC on the network). Completing a 300GB C:drive backup can take easily 48 hours or more.

    I wonder – is this a to be expected performance? My network uses standard PC NW cards, my NW switch supports up to 1000M, so that does not seem to be the bottleneck. In the X311 I use WD Caviar Green drives, which scale performance up to 7200 rpm (and I would expect during a heavy use during a backup it ramps up to that speed).

    Any thoughts on how to improve backup performance on the X311?

  • Hans

    Hi, I have got the 310 now for 6 month and never managed it to go back to sleep after backup – please help.
    Backup time:
    start time 01:00
    end time 03:00
    enable daily sleep : sleep time 04:05, wake time 00:00
    /Hans

  • Sidfleis

    trying to expand my X310. Filled it with 4 drives. Bought a Sans Digital enclosure saying it was “port multiplier enabled” but i think I need a port multiplier card. It doesn’t show you how to put the card into the enclosure. Looks like a PC kind of card going into a PCI Exprsss slot. Really confusing. This must be cutting edge for the typical home based user and the info is thin.