<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Fujitsu Respond to SCALEO Home Server Recovery Confusion</title> <atom:link href="http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/</link> <description>The web&#039;s biggest home server and digital home community, with the latest news, reviews, hardware, software, add-ins and support forums.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bodog (WGS)</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-16000</link> <dc:creator>Bodog (WGS)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:35:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-16000</guid> <description>It was a 50/50 equal joint venture between Fujitsu Limited and Siemens - &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Siemens&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Siemens&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a 50/50 equal joint venture between Fujitsu Limited and Siemens &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Siemens" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Siemens</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Corey</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15926</link> <dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:10:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15926</guid> <description>i received a new download version! thanks for the support WGS and Fujitsu!! Great job done </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i received a new download version! thanks for the support WGS and Fujitsu!! Great job done</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DrewE</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15847</link> <dc:creator>DrewE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15847</guid> <description>Fujitsu Germany is NOT shipping the new disk to me. I received the version FSP:550001135 when I first tried to do a recovery and the original version required a user to have an FSC computer, as stated above. When I contacted Fujitsu-Siemens then they DID send me the newest one at the time. That was back at the end for 2008 or beginning of 2009. The guy I have contact with now tells me that I already received a recover disk, meaning the FSP:550001135, and refuses to send me a new FSP:550001190 one. And he does NOT care what it says on their web-site. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fujitsu Germany is NOT shipping the new disk to me.<br /> I received the version FSP:550001135 when I first tried to do a recovery and the original version required a user to have an FSC computer, as stated above.<br /> When I contacted Fujitsu-Siemens then they DID send me the newest one at the time.<br /> That was back at the end for 2008 or beginning of 2009.<br /> The guy I have contact with now tells me that I already received a recover disk, meaning the FSP:550001135, and refuses to send me a new FSP:550001190 one. And he does NOT care what it says on their web-site.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: urmaster</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15807</link> <dc:creator>urmaster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:05:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15807</guid> <description>Ah thanks for setting me straight. What was the relationship before the buyout? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah thanks for setting me straight. What was the relationship before the buyout?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bodog (WGS)</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15805</link> <dc:creator>Bodog (WGS)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:34:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15805</guid> <description>Just for the record - it&#039;s no longer Fujitsu-Siemens - Fujitsu bought out Siemens last year so the company is Fujitsu (Fujitsu Technology Solutions actually @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://ts.fujitsu.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://ts.fujitsu.com/&lt;/a&gt; ) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record &#8211; it&#039;s no longer Fujitsu-Siemens &#8211; Fujitsu bought out Siemens last year so the company is Fujitsu (Fujitsu Technology Solutions actually @ <a href="http://ts.fujitsu.com/" target="_blank">http://ts.fujitsu.com/</a> )</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BuckDanny</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15693</link> <dc:creator>BuckDanny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15693</guid> <description>Newer SCALEOs (2105 / 2205) are most probably not affected. Check the label on your Server Recovery DVD: if it reads &quot;FSP: 550001190&quot; (or higher), there should be no reason to worry. I&#039;ll ask Fujitsu for additional confirmation, though. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newer SCALEOs (2105 / 2205) are most probably not affected. Check the label on your Server Recovery DVD: if it reads &quot;FSP: 550001190&quot; (or higher), there should be no reason to worry. I&#039;ll ask Fujitsu for additional confirmation, though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BuckDanny</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15692</link> <dc:creator>BuckDanny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:29:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15692</guid> <description>Wow! There&#039;s a post I didn&#039;t expect seeing on WGS when logging on today ... I&#039;m glad my article has received some attention, and kudos to Fujitsu for their prompt reaction ! That being said, this isn&#039;t necessarily the last there is to say about this. In comments on the other blogs, I&#039;m seeing some confusion regarding version numbers, and some reluctance from Fujitsu to actually ship the updated disks. I will post a comment on the Fujitsu blog asking for some clarifications, and report here when there is new information. Meanwhile, I will update the forum thread with the information so far. It&#039;s really great to see WGS being so instrumental in getting this sort of issue resolved ! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! There&#039;s a post I didn&#039;t expect seeing on WGS when logging on today &#8230;</p><p>I&#039;m glad my article has received some attention, and kudos to Fujitsu for their prompt reaction !<br /> That being said, this isn&#039;t necessarily the last there is to say about this. In comments on the other blogs, I&#039;m seeing some confusion regarding version numbers, and some reluctance from Fujitsu to actually ship the updated disks. I will post a comment on the Fujitsu blog asking for some clarifications, and report here when there is new information. Meanwhile, I will update the forum thread with the information so far.</p><p>It&#039;s really great to see WGS being so instrumental in getting this sort of issue resolved !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wazzup</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15686</link> <dc:creator>Wazzup</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:18:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15686</guid> <description>Is the 2205 Series SCALEO also affected by this? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the 2205 Series SCALEO also affected by this?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DrewE</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15680</link> <dc:creator>DrewE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:01:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15680</guid> <description>Thanks everyone and WGS and beyond. I just requested my disc from Fujitsu, lets see how long it takes to get here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone and WGS and beyond.<br /> I just requested my disc from Fujitsu, lets see how long it takes to get here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: urmaster</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2010/02/03/fujitsu-respond-to-scaleo-home-server-recovery-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-15653</link> <dc:creator>urmaster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=19018#comment-15653</guid> <description>Wow super fast response from Fujitsu-Siemens, dare I wonder how long HP would have dithered. cough * hp 3.0 due any-time soon? * cough. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow super fast response from Fujitsu-Siemens, dare I wonder how long HP would have dithered. cough * hp 3.0 due any-time soon? * cough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/18 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 622/631 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.wegotserved.com @ 2012-02-09 20:21:01 -->
