hp3[1]

Hands On: HP EX495 MediaSmart Server

Under the Hood

Models in last two generations of MediaSmart Server differed only in the amount of storage provided in the box – which generally meant that most users purchased the cheaper model and installed their own hard disks. With the EX49x series, however, things are a little different with HP making more fundamental specification differences to the two new models.

EX490EX495
ProcessorIntel Celeron 450 2.2GHz Single-CoreIntel Pentium Dual-Core 2.5GHz E5200
RAM2Gb PC2-64002Gb PC2-6400
Storage1TB (Single Drive)1.5TB (Single Drive)
NetworkingGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
DimensionsWidth: 14cm (5.5″)
Height: 25cm (9.8″)
Depth: 23cm (base)-25cm (top) (9.2″-9.5”
Width: 14cm (5.5″)
Height: 25cm (9.8″)
Depth: 23cm (base)-25cm (top) (9.2″-9.5”
Weight5.00 kg (11.0 lb.)5.00 kg (11.0 lb.)
PowerSleep:  1W
Idle:  41W
Active Load:  43W
Extreme Load:  57W
Sleep:  1W
Idle:  44W
Active Load:  46W
Extreme Load:  70W
Price (US$)$549$699

The EX495 is the more powerful home server in the range, powered by an Intel Pentium Dual–Core E5200 processor whist the EX490 comes equipped with a single-core Celeron 450. Both are capable processors for a home server, and easily outpace competing Intel Atom based systems (such as HP’s own LX195 MediaSmart Server).

HP’s internal tests have found:

The Intel® Pentium® 2.5 GHZ 64-bit Dual Core Processor converts videos 7X faster than servers with an Atom processor and can convert a 115 min video in 70 minutes.

The Intel® Celeron® 2.2 GHZ 64-bit Processor converts video 3.5 times faster than servers with an Atom Processor and can convert a 115 min video in 145 minutes.

The Celeron 450 is a small step up from the 440 which powered HP’s last generation of MediaSmart Server, providing around a 10% speed boost. I found the EX487 to be a little sluggish when accessing it via the Windows Home Server Console, so hopefully this is resolved on the EX490. Our review EX495 however is very snappy indeed with Console usage and remote desktop both performing well on the same network. If you have the choice, my vote is to go with the dual-core EX495.

The EX495 ships with a 1.5TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 hard drive. It’s a lot of storage to pack into a single drive, and should provide most users with sufficient storage to kick off, plus three free drive bays to fill at a future date – check out full details on the drive over at Seagate.

As you’ll notice, both home servers are provided with a single drive of 1TB and 1.5TB respectively – I understand the rationale for this, as most purchasers would prefer to shop around for the best price and fit their own additional storage. Bear in mind, however, that files and folders on single drive systems are not protected by Windows Home Server’s Folder Duplication feature, so make sure you remember to get that extra drive(s).

In summary, whichever model you select, you’ll be running with a high-end specification for a home server, which is ideal for those with large media collections. Having used the EX495 for some weeks now, I wouldn’t go back to an Atom-based home server unless I was really trying to keep the power consumption to a minimum.

One other small, but noticeable change from previous generations of HP MediaSmart Server – it’s certainly quieter! Fan noise is kept to a minimum, and you certainly don’t get the full fan blast at start-up that the EX47x and EX48x greeted you with.


Enjoyed this post? Share it.

If you enjoyed reading this post, then why not share it with your friends and followers?

About Terry Walsh

Terry Walsh is the founding editor and owner of We Got Served. Since February 2007, the site has provided detailed coverage and analysis of the emerging home server category, and has subsequently grown into a trusted outlet for digital home news and reviews.

Sign Up for WGS Daily News

If you don't want to miss out on the latest news from We Got Served, why not subscribe to our daily digest? You'll get the day's headlines and a short summary of each news item delivered straight to your inbox each morning.

, , , , ,

  • Martin

    Brill thanks for that!

  • Alex

    any news on the European Market ( United Kingdom area)

    I've been looking at upgrading from a ex475, as far as I can tell not available yet

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tezzer Terry Walsh

      Amazon.co.uk have the EX490 listed for pre-order – no news on the 495 as yet….

  • http://www.mediasmartserver.net Alex Kuretz

    Nice review Terry! I suspect the issues you saw with MKV's was due to multi-channel audio. In the previous version of the Video Converter I experienced the same issue with multi-channel audio tracks in mkv files, but found that 2-channel stereo tracks converted with the audio intact.
    http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/04/23/forum-…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tezzer Terry Walsh

      Great wiki, Alex – did you ping HP re: the multi-channel issue? Would be good to see if they can fix!

      • http://www.mediasmartserver.net Alex Kuretz

        I did not, that's a good idea. I'm not familiar with the Arcsoft software they use for the Converter so don't know if/how it handles downmixing multi-channel audio to stereo, but it can't hurt to ask!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/urmaster urmaster

    Full client backups of the mac dont count for the 10 computer limit? hmmm.
    Anyhow nice review Terry.

  • James Cocker

    Liking the improved Mac features. However anyone know what the disadvantages of having to use SMB as opposed to AFP on a Mac are?

  • Lee Ladisky

    Anyone know of an easy way to migrate from a 475 to the 495? Can I just put the System drive of the 475 into the 495 (along with all the other drives used) and do a Server Recovery to avoid the slow copy process????? Anyone with thoughts on this? There are a few comments between 475 and 485, but nothing that goes cross processor/platform… concern obviously being about drivers, etc…. thoughts?

    Lee

    • http://www.mediasmartserver.net Alex Kuretz

      The EX48x and EX49x are very similar, the problem will be in the licensing, I don't believe WHS will auto-activate. I instead recommend the Server Recovery route as I described in this blog post.
      http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/08/28/using-…

  • Alex

    I wouldn't think that would work from an amd system to an intel system ( definitely get a blue screen if you had a monitor hooked up )

  • Tom

    Any word on HP releasing an update for the EX48x. I really want the updated Mac experience!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/tezzer Terry Walsh

      I think there should be an update coming from HP soon on this….

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Hands On: HP EX495 MediaSmart Server | We Got Served - Windows Home Server & Your Digital Home -- Topsy.com

  • davidob

    For the 47x crowd that used WebShare and switched to PhotoPublisher, what has been your experience? Do you have to recreate existing albums or do they migrate, can you limit access to albums per user, etc?

  • http://bluppen.com deriksen

    @davidob. Was wondering the same thing. Without any Macs in the household I'm a bit hesitant to push for the 3.0 upgrade. I'm quite a heavy Photo Webshare user. Any insight from other readers would be very welcome.

  • Pingback: ::. DataKill .:: » Blog Archiv » WHS – Yes! Now I own one