<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Hands-On: Sans Digital TR4M-B 4-Bay SATA DAS Enclosure</title> <atom:link href="http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/</link> <description>The web&#039;s biggest home server and digital home community, with the latest news, reviews, hardware, software, add-ins and support forums.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: @kevinswartz</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-59017</link> <dc:creator>@kevinswartz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 04:22:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-59017</guid> <description>OK - in regards to my above post, I learned something, when you add a disk as a &quot;backup disk&quot;, it&#039;s not what I thought it was (I thought the disk would be preferentially used for folder duplication). Anyway, I&#039;ll assume people reading this probably already knew this. What I did was, starting with the drive in Slot #4, removed the disk and then re-added it as a regular disk to use in the total WHS pool, then went to slot #3 and so on. So, far no other kinks. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; in regards to my above post, I learned something, when you add a disk as a &quot;backup disk&quot;, it&#039;s not what I thought it was (I thought the disk would be preferentially used for folder duplication). Anyway, I&#039;ll assume people reading this probably already knew this.</p><p>What I did was, starting with the drive in Slot #4, removed the disk and then re-added it as a regular disk to use in the total WHS pool, then went to slot #3 and so on.</p><p>So, far no other kinks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: @kevinswartz</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-59013</link> <dc:creator>@kevinswartz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:56:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-59013</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know if this helps anyone else out, but I messed around with this for 2 separate nights and i &quot;Think&quot; I finally have this set up on my HP EX490 (with an upgraded CPU to E8400). I have mixed drives in the WHS (2x WD Green 2TB drives, 1x TB WD Black drive, and then the OEM 1TB Seagate drive). I have mixed hard drives in the enclosure, 2x WD Green 1TB drives and 2x Seagate 500GB 7200 rpm drives. Of course, the TR4M is just plugged into the eSATA connection on the back of the EX490.  I tried multiple things, but I think the following points in the following order made the final difference 1. Connected the TR4M enclosure to a notebook PC running Windows 7 with eSATA and loaded each HDD individually into bay #1 (THE BOTTOM SLOT) and then formatted the drive with NTFS, removed it then powered off the enclosure and then loaded another disk, turned on the enclosure and then formatted another disk - repeated for all 4 drives. 2. Loaded one drive (one of the 1TB WD drives) into bay #1 (THE BOTTOM SLOT), turned on the TR4M and THEN turned on the HP EX490 and allowed it to fully boot up. I had the orange &quot;power&quot; light on, the green &quot;host&quot; light on, and the slot #1 green light on. 3. Added the drive into the disk pool from within the &quot;Server Storage&quot; tab in the WHS console, which for me, I added it as a backup drive and chose to format the disk again and gave the drive a unique name which I then stuck a label on the appropriate disk so you can see it when you open the door to the TR4M. 4. Then, WITHOUT turning anything off, I loaded another disk into slot #2 (the second from the bottom) which I added my second 1TB WD drive. Some lights flashed on and off and then the #1 and #2 lights stayed on and green. I then repeated step #3 above for the new drive. 5. I then repeated steps #4 and then #3 for disks installed into slots 3 and 4. 6. Of note, I was having some problems when I had the Tentacle Software Disk Management for WHS add-in installed. (the TR4M kept going out...) which resolved when I uninstalled this add-in. Obviously the reviewer above did not seem to have any problems with this add-in; I have not gone back and re-installed this and experimented. Just FYI. Anyway, after much messing around, I&#039;ve let my server run for an hour or so, restarted it a couple times, and turned on duplication for some folders and it looks like the external enclosure is now staying on with all 4 drives active and I don&#039;t... think... there... are any problems.... however I&#039;m personally not going to put any drives that aren&#039;t backed up into here until I know for sure it&#039;s running flawlessly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know if this helps anyone else out, but I messed around with this for 2 separate nights and i &quot;Think&quot; I finally have this set up on my HP EX490 (with an upgraded CPU to E8400). I have mixed drives in the WHS (2x WD Green 2TB drives, 1x TB WD Black drive, and then the OEM 1TB Seagate drive). I have mixed hard drives in the enclosure, 2x WD Green 1TB drives and 2x Seagate 500GB 7200 rpm drives. Of course, the TR4M is just plugged into the eSATA connection on the back of the EX490.  I tried multiple things, but I think the following points in the following order made the final difference</p><p>1. Connected the TR4M enclosure to a notebook PC running Windows 7 with eSATA and loaded each HDD individually into bay #1 (THE BOTTOM SLOT) and then formatted the drive with NTFS, removed it then powered off the enclosure and then loaded another disk, turned on the enclosure and then formatted another disk &#8211; repeated for all 4 drives.</p><p>2. Loaded one drive (one of the 1TB WD drives) into bay #1 (THE BOTTOM SLOT), turned on the TR4M and THEN turned on the HP EX490 and allowed it to fully boot up. I had the orange &quot;power&quot; light on, the green &quot;host&quot; light on, and the slot #1 green light on.</p><p>3. Added the drive into the disk pool from within the &quot;Server Storage&quot; tab in the WHS console, which for me, I added it as a backup drive and chose to format the disk again and gave the drive a unique name which I then stuck a label on the appropriate disk so you can see it when you open the door to the TR4M.</p><p>4. Then, WITHOUT turning anything off, I loaded another disk into slot #2 (the second from the bottom) which I added my second 1TB WD drive. Some lights flashed on and off and then the #1 and #2 lights stayed on and green. I then repeated step #3 above for the new drive.</p><p>5. I then repeated steps #4 and then #3 for disks installed into slots 3 and 4.</p><p>6. Of note, I was having some problems when I had the Tentacle Software Disk Management for WHS add-in installed. (the TR4M kept going out&#8230;) which resolved when I uninstalled this add-in. Obviously the reviewer above did not seem to have any problems with this add-in; I have not gone back and re-installed this and experimented. Just FYI.</p><p>Anyway, after much messing around, I&#039;ve let my server run for an hour or so, restarted it a couple times, and turned on duplication for some folders and it looks like the external enclosure is now staying on with all 4 drives active and I don&#039;t&#8230; think&#8230; there&#8230; are any problems&#8230;. however I&#039;m personally not going to put any drives that aren&#039;t backed up into here until I know for sure it&#039;s running flawlessly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: moggy</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-52613</link> <dc:creator>moggy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-52613</guid> <description>after seeing this article . last week i ordered the SANS DIGITAL TowerRAID TR4M-BNC 4 Bay   from newegg  it was on for $64  does not come with an esata card .  and looks just like your housing . found oa SNT SNT-PCIX CARD  for $24   it uses the Silicon Image 3132  works great .  I am very pleased with unit and I am going to order 2 more esata cards for my other computers </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after seeing this article . last week i ordered the SANS DIGITAL TowerRAID TR4M-BNC 4 Bay   from newegg  it was on for $64  does not come with an esata card .  and looks just like your housing . found oa SNT SNT-PCIX CARD  for $24   it uses the Silicon Image 3132  works great .  I am very pleased with unit and I am going to order 2 more esata cards for my other computers</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gringott</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-10665</link> <dc:creator>gringott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:16:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-10665</guid> <description>I just ordered my third one, this one from newegg - $149, free shipping, and they included a Segate 1 TB 5900 RPM &#039;green&#039; drive for free - that&#039;s a $79 drive on the site. I call them my &#039;mini&#039; Clariions. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ordered my third one, this one from newegg &#8211; $149, free shipping, and they included a Segate 1 TB 5900 RPM &#039;green&#039; drive for free &#8211; that&#039;s a $79 drive on the site. I call them my &#039;mini&#039; Clariions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kam Lau</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-9813</link> <dc:creator>Kam Lau</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:39:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-9813</guid> <description>Thanks for your review.  It helped me decide to try the Sans Digital TowerRAID with my Acer easyStore Home Server.  It works flawlessly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your review.  It helped me decide to try the Sans Digital TowerRAID with my Acer easyStore Home Server.  It works flawlessly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Comp SANS DIGITAL TowerRAID TR4M-B (Port Multiplier)&#8230;..$199.99 with free shipping &#8212; Canadian Free Stuff</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-8185</link> <dc:creator>Comp SANS DIGITAL TowerRAID TR4M-B (Port Multiplier)&#8230;..$199.99 with free shipping &#8212; Canadian Free Stuff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-8185</guid> <description>[...] review 1 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] review 1 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan Benway</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-3944</link> <dc:creator>Alan Benway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-3944</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-12879&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Kevin Davis&lt;/a&gt; - Kevin is correct. But there are only 3 eSATA chipsets out there (I had a list of their names but now I can&#039;t find it) and only the SI seems to support the proper port-multiplier feature. Some motherboads have SI SATA controllers - don&#039;t know if they would work using an eSATA finger connector plugged into a M/B SATA socket.Anyway, I am having even more problems with the TR4M not coming up when the system boots. My method of powering up the eSATA units 10 seconds before the PC has stopped working for the TR4M. So far I can&#039;t get it to work today (I only see the orange power LED, no Green host connect light once the bus scan detects the HBA). Since I have too much work lately to do I don&#039;t have time to mess with it anymore. Going to replace it, and use the TR4M on another PC that rarely gets rebooted (security camera system controller and CIFS backups for the other 4 systems I have. I will send an email to tech@sansdigital to see if they have an answer (or even do answer).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-12879' rel="nofollow">@Kevin Davis</a> -<br /> Kevin is correct. But there are only 3 eSATA chipsets out there (I had a list of their names but now I can&#8217;t find it) and only the SI seems to support the proper port-multiplier feature. Some motherboads have SI SATA controllers &#8211; don&#8217;t know if they would work using an eSATA finger connector plugged into a M/B SATA socket.</p><p>Anyway, I am having even more problems with the TR4M not coming up when the system boots. My method of powering up the eSATA units 10 seconds before the PC has stopped working for the TR4M. So far I can&#8217;t get it to work today (I only see the orange power LED, no Green host connect light once the bus scan detects the HBA). Since I have too much work lately to do I don&#8217;t have time to mess with it anymore. Going to replace it, and use the TR4M on another PC that rarely gets rebooted (security camera system controller and CIFS backups for the other 4 systems I have. I will send an email to tech@sansdigital to see if they have an answer (or even do answer).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Davis</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-3925</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Davis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:22:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-3925</guid> <description>Because this enclosure uses a port multiplier your eSATA chip set must be &quot;multiplier aware&quot;, not all chip sets are. If you move to one that isn&#039;t, it will only recognize the first drive, if any at all. The first gen HP  MediaSmart servers use a different motherboard and chip set that are multiplier aware, so they will work with this box. However the new HP servers use an intel chip set that does not support multipliers and won&#039;t work with them at all. I hope this clears up some of the confusion about it being a true DAS or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because this enclosure uses a port multiplier your eSATA chip set must be &#8220;multiplier aware&#8221;, not all chip sets are. If you move to one that isn&#8217;t, it will only recognize the first drive, if any at all. The first gen HP  MediaSmart servers use a different motherboard and chip set that are multiplier aware, so they will work with this box. However the new HP servers use an intel chip set that does not support multipliers and won&#8217;t work with them at all. I hope this clears up some of the confusion about it being a true DAS or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Clark</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-3940</link> <dc:creator>Jim Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:02:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-3940</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-12708&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Alan Benway&lt;/a&gt; - Sounds you look have a pretty array of tools and understanding of how to test this kind of HW.  Very nice!It has been long enough that I do not remember some details:  I had to return the drives, but they let me keep the enclosure.  I had at one point 2 drives and later 3 drives in the unit.  iirc, I had drives installed opposite (top down?) of what one responder indicated they needed to be.  Worked fine.Currently, it is not in use as I lost 3 drives in one day.  2 were in the Sans Digital and 1 in my computer.  As a result, I have nothing ATM to test with.I do not use RAID arrays much anymore, I&#039;m more a JBOD user now, since is independent of having to match drive models.  So I can not discuss much on that.  In my review, it worked quite well, but it was of course 4 drives w/the provided controller.When you say the Sans Digital works only 3132 controllers, I get the impression that this is RAID setups?  If I am wrong there, correct me.  Assuming that, what about JBOD/San Digital/non-3132 controllers?  Go or no go?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-12708' rel="nofollow">@Alan Benway</a> &#8211; Sounds you look have a pretty array of tools and understanding of how to test this kind of HW.  Very nice!</p><p>It has been long enough that I do not remember some details:  I had to return the drives, but they let me keep the enclosure.  I had at one point 2 drives and later 3 drives in the unit.  iirc, I had drives installed opposite (top down?) of what one responder indicated they needed to be.  Worked fine.</p><p>Currently, it is not in use as I lost 3 drives in one day.  2 were in the Sans Digital and 1 in my computer.  As a result, I have nothing ATM to test with.</p><p>I do not use RAID arrays much anymore, I&#8217;m more a JBOD user now, since is independent of having to match drive models.  So I can not discuss much on that.  In my review, it worked quite well, but it was of course 4 drives w/the provided controller.</p><p>When you say the Sans Digital works only 3132 controllers, I get the impression that this is RAID setups?  If I am wrong there, correct me.  Assuming that, what about JBOD/San Digital/non-3132 controllers?  Go or no go?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan Benway</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-3939</link> <dc:creator>Alan Benway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:36:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-3939</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-12650&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jim Clark&lt;/a&gt; - Hi Jim,I bought some extra hardware at the local FRYs yesterday to try an experiment. I added an internal 1TB Seagate drive and backed up everything on my 2 TowerRAID volumes to it to start with. I also bought an IOGear GICe702S3R5 2-port PCIe HBA which is also an SiI 3132 chip just like the rebranded SiI HBA included with the TR4M. I have 3 eSATA attached DAS units to experiment with: TR4M with 4 500GB HDDs, RAID-0 is one; the Termaltake MUSE R-Duo with 2 400GB HDDs, RAID-0 is the second; and a Vantec eSATA enclosure with 1 320GB HDD is the third (these run too hot after a few hours of moderate use for a work disk on my system).I did have an SIIG PCI HBA with 2 eSATA ports (not an SiI 3132 ASIC) already in my main PC before I added the HBA from the TR4M. I had the MUSE and Vantec attached to that original HBA. Once I added the TR4M to the system, port-1 on the SIIG stopped working, and port-2 was eratic. Some sort of system conflict that I couldn&#039;t find. Hence the removal of the SIIG HBA (it was just PCI anyway), and the installation of the new IOgear PCIe HBA ($30).All 4 eSATA ports work reliably now, although I still must power up the TR4M unit about 5 seconds before the PC power, or the TR4M will not get picked up on the port scan (no green light, no disks visible).As an experiment, I moved the TR4M to a port on the IOgear, and moved the other units over to the TR4M&#039;s HBA. All units worked fine. I was wondering where the config info was kept for the RAID configurations, and evidently it is on the multi-port logic in the TR4M unit itself. I would have to install another IOgear HBA in a second PC here to verify that this is not captured in the Registry somewhere, but I doubt that is the case.BTW: When I backed up the TR4M file systems to the new 1TB Seagate I timed the operations. The first volume on the TR4M contained 80.2GB of data (82,370 files, 6353 folders) and averaged 51MB/s (since this was a sequential operation). The second volume had a lot more very large Zip files (2-3 GB each), so the sequential efficiency was higher. That volume had 184.3GB (107,834 files, 10,887 folders) and it averaged 65MB/s. Hence, read performance out of the TR4M (in RAID-0)is very good, as is the write performance to the 1TB Seagate.I haven&#039;t had time yet to run multi-threaded IOmeter tests and conduct small block random tests (an IOPS measurement) to compare the 1TB Seagate with the TR4M and the MUSE boxes. As random (IOPS with a Response Time) and sequential (throughput as MB/s) workloads are at the opposite ends of the spectrum, a unit-unit-test can behave very differently. A sequential workload is the easiest test for any system controller, but it also shows up the back-end design limitations (larger arrays) as well.BTW: At FRYs yesterday, there were 5 returned TR4M units on the shelf, and the sales dude who manages that section said those people couldn&#039;t get more than one disk to work. So they were also tripped up on the nature of the box and required use of the 3132 controller.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-12650' rel="nofollow">@Jim Clark</a> -<br /> Hi Jim,</p><p>I bought some extra hardware at the local FRYs yesterday to try an experiment. I added an internal 1TB Seagate drive and backed up everything on my 2 TowerRAID volumes to it to start with. I also bought an IOGear GICe702S3R5 2-port PCIe HBA which is also an SiI 3132 chip just like the rebranded SiI HBA included with the TR4M. I have 3 eSATA attached DAS units to experiment with: TR4M with 4 500GB HDDs, RAID-0 is one; the Termaltake MUSE R-Duo with 2 400GB HDDs, RAID-0 is the second; and a Vantec eSATA enclosure with 1 320GB HDD is the third (these run too hot after a few hours of moderate use for a work disk on my system).</p><p>I did have an SIIG PCI HBA with 2 eSATA ports (not an SiI 3132 ASIC) already in my main PC before I added the HBA from the TR4M. I had the MUSE and Vantec attached to that original HBA. Once I added the TR4M to the system, port-1 on the SIIG stopped working, and port-2 was eratic. Some sort of system conflict that I couldn&#8217;t find. Hence the removal of the SIIG HBA (it was just PCI anyway), and the installation of the new IOgear PCIe HBA ($30).</p><p>All 4 eSATA ports work reliably now, although I still must power up the TR4M unit about 5 seconds before the PC power, or the TR4M will not get picked up on the port scan (no green light, no disks visible).</p><p>As an experiment, I moved the TR4M to a port on the IOgear, and moved the other units over to the TR4M&#8217;s HBA. All units worked fine. I was wondering where the config info was kept for the RAID configurations, and evidently it is on the multi-port logic in the TR4M unit itself. I would have to install another IOgear HBA in a second PC here to verify that this is not captured in the Registry somewhere, but I doubt that is the case.</p><p>BTW: When I backed up the TR4M file systems to the new 1TB Seagate I timed the operations. The first volume on the TR4M contained 80.2GB of data (82,370 files, 6353 folders) and averaged 51MB/s (since this was a sequential operation). The second volume had a lot more very large Zip files (2-3 GB each), so the sequential efficiency was higher. That volume had 184.3GB (107,834 files, 10,887 folders) and it averaged 65MB/s. Hence, read performance out of the TR4M (in RAID-0)is very good, as is the write performance to the 1TB Seagate.</p><p>I haven&#8217;t had time yet to run multi-threaded IOmeter tests and conduct small block random tests (an IOPS measurement) to compare the 1TB Seagate with the TR4M and the MUSE boxes. As random (IOPS with a Response Time) and sequential (throughput as MB/s) workloads are at the opposite ends of the spectrum, a unit-unit-test can behave very differently. A sequential workload is the easiest test for any system controller, but it also shows up the back-end design limitations (larger arrays) as well.</p><p>BTW: At FRYs yesterday, there were 5 returned TR4M units on the shelf, and the sales dude who manages that section said those people couldn&#8217;t get more than one disk to work. So they were also tripped up on the nature of the box and required use of the 3132 controller.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andres</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-3938</link> <dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-3938</guid> <description>To all,Thanks for the clarification on the SI chipset restrictions to use this device. My Express Card adapter has a 3132 chip, and the last comment suggests it should work. Going for it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all,</p><p>Thanks for the clarification on the SI chipset restrictions to use this device. My Express Card adapter has a 3132 chip, and the last comment suggests it should work. Going for it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Clark</title><link>http://www.wegotserved.com/2008/09/21/sans-digital-tr4m-b-4-bay-sata-das-enclosure-review/comment-page-2/#comment-3927</link> <dc:creator>Jim Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:58:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wegotserved.com/?p=3605#comment-3927</guid> <description>To Alan and Patrick:  Regardless of who is right or wrong, both of you have provided some interesting points about the Sans Digital unit.  Egos aside :), good stuff!  Some of the points made probably go a little over my head, as I certainly do not consider myself a storage expert.I will point out one thing.  No where in my review do I indicate anything about hardware Raid.  Everything at the beginning refers to software-based Raid.  I would hope that most users/readers would understand that one is not going to get hardware Raid at this price point.And FWIW, I did plug this directly from the original eSATA card to another one w/o a problem.  Granted, it was another variation of a 3132 chip.  From comments here and from Sans Digital, it also works with the HP MSS units.  I would be curious to know what eSATA chip they use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Alan and Patrick:  Regardless of who is right or wrong, both of you have provided some interesting points about the Sans Digital unit.  Egos aside <img src='http://www.wegotserved.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> , good stuff!  Some of the points made probably go a little over my head, as I certainly do not consider myself a storage expert.</p><p>I will point out one thing.  No where in my review do I indicate anything about hardware Raid.  Everything at the beginning refers to software-based Raid.  I would hope that most users/readers would understand that one is not going to get hardware Raid at this price point.</p><p>And FWIW, I did plug this directly from the original eSATA card to another one w/o a problem.  Granted, it was another variation of a 3132 chip.  From comments here and from Sans Digital, it also works with the HP MSS units.  I would be curious to know what eSATA chip they use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/16 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 657/658 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.wegotserved.com @ 2012-02-09 17:59:25 -->
